View Document


Predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Youth Mental Health Clinicians
Department: Psychology
ResourceLengthWidthThickness
Paper000
Specimen Elements
Pocatello
Unknown to Unknown
Christina Strauch
Idaho State University
Dissertation
No
2/4/2025
digital
City: Pocatello
Doctorate
Although notable gains have been made in the development and dissemination of evidence- based treatments (EBTs) to address post-traumatic stress (PTS) and related sequalae, far less progress has been made in predicting and ameliorating clinicians’ reactions to client-presented traumatic material, particularly secondary traumatic stress (STS). Prior research has identified several STS risk and protective factors, both at the intra- and inter-personal levels, amongst mental health clinicians. Still, most of this research has been conducted either with non- specified mental health clinicians or adult-focused clinicians. Only one known study has examined STS among child-focused clinicians, exclusively, and this study only evaluated a training program to reduce clinicians’ STS. Therefore, the current study sought to fill gaps in the above literature by (1) focusing on child-focused clinicians; (2) examining overall STS and specific symptom categories (i.e., arousal, avoidance, and intrusion); (3) investigating the relation between clinician-reported STS and self-efficacy specific to trauma-focused EBPs, rather than general clinician self-efficacy; (3) examining the relation between clinician-reported STS and clinician adherence to trauma-focused EBPs, rather than clinician attitudes towards EBPs broadly; and (4) exploring how organizational support of clinician-experienced STS may be protective. To address these aims, survey data were collected online from 135 mental health clinicians who predominately provided trauma-focused treatment to youth. These participants completed the following measures: demographic and professional-role questions, the Secondary Traumatic Stress Scale, the TF-CBT Clinical Skills Questionnaire, the TF-CBT Practices Scale, the Trauma Systems Readiness Tool, and the Professional Quality of Life Scale’s Compassion Satisfaction subscale. Relations between tested predictor variables (i.e., clinician trauma-caseload, self-efficacy with trauma-focused EBPs, adherence to trauma- focused EBPs, organizational support of clinician-experienced STS, and compassion satisfaction) and outcome variables (i.e., overall STS, as well as arousal, avoidance, and intrusion symptoms) were examined with multiple univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Collectively, analyzed variables significantly predicted clinician-reported overall STS; R2 = .21, R2adjusted = .18, p < .001; with higher trauma caseload ( = .26; sr = .25, p < .01) and lower compassion satisfaction ( = -.42; sr = -.34, p < .001) significantly increasing risk of overall STS symptoms to a small-to-moderate and moderate degree, respectively. The overall model also significantly predicted all three symptom domains of clinician-reported STS; namely: arousal symptoms; R2 = .13, R2adjusted = .07, p = .02; avoidance symptoms; R2 = .18, R2adjusted = .13, p < .001; and intrusion symptoms; R2 = .26, R2adjusted = .21, p < .001. More specifically, greater compassion satisfaction significantly predicted lower STS arousal, avoidance, intrusion symptoms to a moderate degree (i.e., Arousal [f = .23, p = .01], Avoidance [f = .31, p < .001], Intrusion [f = .35, p < .001]); whereas, greater trauma caseloads significantly predicted greater STS intrusion–but not arousal or avoidance–symptoms to a moderate degree (f = .37, p < .01). In contrast, clinician-reported self-efficacy with trauma-focused EBPs, adherence to trauma- focused EBPs, and organizational support of clinician-experienced STS (per TCSQ, TPS, and TSRT scores) did not significantly predict reported overall or domain-specific STS symptoms. Such results are notable because 1) they are the first to be observed with this population (i.e., community therapists treating trauma-affected youth), 2) they are some of the first to suggest that risk and protective factors may differ in their influence over specific STS domains, and 3) they inform potential approaches to preventing and/or ameliorating STS symptoms, such as balancing clinicians’ percentage of trauma cases in their caseload and engaging in individual and organizational practices that bolster compassion satisfaction. Keywords: secondary-traumatic stress (STS), burnout, self-efficacy, adherence, compassion satisfaction, evidenced based practices/treatments (EBPs/EBTs)

Predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Youth Mental Health Clinicians

Necessary Documents

Paper

Document

Information
Paper -Document

2008 - 2016 Informatics Research Institute (IRI)
Version 0.6.1.5 | beta | 6 April 2016

Other Projects